Back to home

Compare

Comparing: My AI Almost Wrecked a Client Deal — Utah's News Made Me Rethink Responsibility & 我用 AI 给客户写的方案差点翻车 — 犹他那条新闻让我重新想了想责任这事

AEN
AI responsibilityNolla Healthnon-coder entrepreneur·

My AI Almost Wrecked a Client Deal — Utah's News Made Me Rethink Responsibility

The email my AI wrote last week almost cost me a client

Xiaolin runs a Xiaohongshu consulting client I work with. She vented to me last week: she had AI write a reply to a client, the tone came off too aggressive, and a long-time client canceled next month's service on the spot. I've made this exact same mistake — I once let AI auto-reply for me and ended up quoting the client at 2x the right price.

Right after we finished talking, the Utah news popped up on my feed.

Utah let AI write acne prescriptions — the real fight is "who's on the hook"

Utah just approved a company called Nolla Health to let AI write initial acne prescriptions for patients. Note: not assisting doctors — the AI writes them, doctors check at stages.

The moment this dropped, the debate exploded. If it prescribes wrong, who's responsible? The doctor says "AI wrote it," AI says "the doctor signed off," and the patient is stuck in the middle.

Same problem we have with AI writing contracts, replying to clients, making decisions.

I made this exact mistake before: let AI send a client quote without my eyes on it. Ended up writing 80000 instead of 8000, the client screenshotted it and posted it in a group. We didn't close the deal, and my brand reputation took a hit.

This news reminded me: AI is getting more "automatic," but "automatic" ≠ "off the hook."

Replication cost: $0 + 1 hour + no tech skills

- Money: $0 (the news itself is free)
- Time: 1-2 hours (map out which parts of your workflow use AI)
- Tech barrier: no code needed, just open your usual AI tool
- First step: open whatever AI tool you used recently (Doubao / Kimi / ChatGPT all work), scroll through what you let it "automatically" handle last week. Ask yourself: if this step went wrong, would I know immediately?

Concrete actions:
1. Important external content (contracts, quotes, complaint replies) must have a human final check
2. Set a "red line list" for AI — what types of decisions it can't make alone
3. Have an "AI went wrong" playbook — how to tell clients, how to recover

This isn't urgent, but it's coming. I only started writing my own list last month.

Advice by stage

If you're just starting out (still finding clients): I'd treat AI like an "intern" — important stuff, always run it through yourself. No rush to test it now, but build the habit.

If you already have 1-2 stable clients: I'd spend a weekend listing all the "AI-automated steps" in your workflow, mark which ones are high-risk. I only did this after that quote disaster myself.

If you're scaling (about to hire or already have a 1-5 person team): I'd strongly recommend writing up an "AI Usage Policy" — even just one page, spelling out what AI can decide alone vs. what needs human review. Not complicated, but it'll save you when something goes wrong.

BZH
AI 责任Nolla Health非码农创业者·

我用 AI 给客户写的方案差点翻车 — 犹他那条新闻让我重新想了想责任这事

上周我用 AI 写的那封邮件,差点让客户跑掉

小林是我一个做小红书咨询的客户。她上周找我诉苦:她让 AI 写的一封客户回信,语气太冲,老客户当场取消了下个月的服务。这事我也搞错过——我自己也用 AI 自动回复过一次,结果把客户报价写错了两倍。

我跟她聊完,就刷到了犹他州那条新闻。

犹他州让 AI 开祛痘处方,最大的争议是"谁来负责"

犹他州最近批准了一家叫 Nolla Health 的公司,让 AI 直接给患者开初始的祛痘药方。注意,不是辅助医生,是 AI 自己开,医生分阶段把关。

这事一出就引发了讨论——开错了,谁负责?医生说"AI 开的",AI 说"医生最终签了字",患者夹在中间。

跟我们用 AI 写合同、回客户、做决策,是同一个问题。

我之前犯过一个错:让 AI 直接给客户发报价,没过我眼睛。结果把 8000 写成 80000,客户截图发到群里。虽然最后没成交,但品牌口碑受了影响。

这条新闻提醒我:现在 AI 越来越"自动",但"自动"≠"免责"。

复刻成本:0 元 + 1 小时 + 不用懂技术

- 钱:0 元(这条新闻本身不要钱)
- 时间:1-2 小时(梳理你哪些环节用了 AI)
- 技术门槛:不用懂代码,打开你常用的 AI 工具就行
- 第一步:打开你最近用的 AI 工具(豆包 / Kimi / ChatGPT 都行),翻一翻你上周让它"自动"处理的事。问自己一句:如果这一步出错了,我能第一时间知道吗?

具体可以做的事:
1. 重要对外内容(合同、报价、投诉回复)必须有人工最后一道
2. 给 AI 设个"红线清单"——什么类型的事它不能单独决定
3. 留个"AI 出错"的预案——出问题时怎么跟客户说、怎么补救

这事不急,但迟早要梳理。我自己也是上个月才真正开始写这个清单。

分人群建议

如果你是刚起步(还在找客户):我建议把 AI 当成"实习生",重要的事一定自己过一遍。现在不试也没事,但养成习惯。

如果你已经有 1-2 个稳定客户:我会建议你花一个周末把"AI 自动处理的环节"列个清单,标出哪些是高风险的。我自己就是那次报价写错之后才这么干的。

如果你正在扩规模(准备招人或已经有 1-5 人小团队):我会强烈建议你设个"AI 使用规范"——哪怕就一页纸,写清楚什么可以让 AI 单独决定,什么必须人审核。这事不复杂,但出问题时能救你。