Back to home

Compare

Comparing: Alibaba Cloud's Agentic Lake — China's Cloud Vendors Race on Infrastructure & 阿里云把数据湖改成 Agent 工具箱 — 中国云厂商开始拼底层

AEN
Alibaba CloudOpenLakeDataWorks·

Alibaba Cloud's Agentic Lake — China's Cloud Vendors Race on Infrastructure

The move worth recording from Alibaba Cloud's Apsara Conference 2026: rebuilding the data lake (a technology that centralizes and analyzes all of an enterprise's data) — built over the past decade for data analysts — as a toolbox directly callable by AI Agents (AI programs capable of autonomously completing multi-step tasks). We note this reflects a judgment — that competition in China's enterprise AI is shifting from "whose model is smarter" downward to "whether the underlying infrastructure can catch Agents."

What This Is

Alibaba Cloud's solution is a three-layer stack. The bottom layer is OpenLake upgraded to Agentic Lake (a data lake built for Agents): using DLF's Omni Catalog (a unified catalog — essentially registering scattered data tables and files onto a single central manifest) — structured data (orders, spreadsheets) and unstructured data (documents, images, video) can be discovered under a single system. Real-time data is handled by Fluss, historical data remains in Paimon 2.0, and the two are combined into a unified view through Union Read (a "real-time + historical read simultaneously" approach).

The middle layer consists of a series of Agentic Engines (compute engines callable by Agents) — MaxCompute, Hologres, Elasticsearch and others — exposing Skill (skill interfaces, packaged functional modules) and MCP (a standard protocol allowing Agents to invoke external tools, essentially a "plug-and-play" universal interface) to Agents. The top layer is DataWorks's Data Agent: powered by a "semantic graph" (mapping the relationships between tables, fields, and business meanings into a graph — essentially an enterprise data dictionary for Agents), it understands that "total sales" is not the same thing in finance and business departments, and exposes an OSI interface allowing third-party Agents to invoke it.

Industry View

Supporters argue the direction is sound — industry experience shows that most enterprise Agent failures are not caused by weak models but by data being unfindable, misaligned, or inconsistently defined. Without rebuilding infrastructure, even the smartest Agent can only perform in demos. DataWorks's semantic layer combined with MCP's open strategy is indeed closer to production than the patchwork of each department plugging into its own model.

But we need to keep two doubts. First, complexity: the full architecture involves more than ten Alibaba Cloud products — DLF, Paimon, Fluss, MaxCompute, Hologres, PAI and others — making the deployment barrier far higher than traditional data warehouses (databases). Second, ecosystem: "Agent-ready" is still a self-defined Alibaba Cloud standard, with no cross-cloud, cross-vendor portability verified. Overseas, Databricks and Snowflake are building similar architectures, and the outcome will be decided not by technology but by ecosystem lock-in.

Impact on Regular People

For enterprise IT: Over the next 1-2 years, when selecting a data platform, they will be forced into a decision far heavier than past upgrades — continue reinforcing traditional data warehouses, or rebuild the underlying layer for Agents. Budget and capabilities both need reassessment.

For individual careers: The hard-skill barrier of "knowing SQL (Structured Query Language, the foundational database operation skill)" is being eroded by tools like DataWorks that generate code from natural language. Data analysts must upgrade toward a "business-savvy + Agent-orchestration-savvy" combo, or their value space will be compressed.

For the consumer market: No visible change in the short term. It will take at least another 2-3 years for the dividend of Agentic Lake to reach consumers, depending on how many enterprises actually put Agents into production workflows.

Source: juejin.cn
BZH
阿里云OpenLakeDataWorks·

阿里云把数据湖改成 Agent 工具箱 — 中国云厂商开始拼底层

阿里云云栖大会 2026 上值得我们记一笔的动作:把过去十年建给数据分析师用的数据湖(一种把企业所有数据集中存储并分析的技术),重做成能让 AI Agent(能自主完成多步任务的 AI 程序)直接调用的工具箱。我们注意到,这背后是一个判断 —— 中国企业级 AI 的比拼正在从“模型谁更聪明”沉到“底层设施能不能接住 Agent”。

这是什么

阿里云的解法是三层堆叠。底层是 OpenLake 升级为 Agentic Lake(面向 Agent 的数据湖):用 DLF 的 Omni Catalog(统一目录,相当于把分散的数据表、文件登记在同一张中央清单上)让结构化数据(订单、表格)和非结构化数据(文档、图片、视频)能在同一体系下被发现;实时数据由 Fluss 承接,历史数据留在 Paimon 2.0 中,两者通过 Union Read(一种“实时+历史同时读到”的读取方式)合成一个统一视图。

中间层是 MaxCompute、Hologres、Elasticsearch 等一系列 Agentic Engine(Agent 可调用的计算引擎),向 Agent 开放 Skill(技能接口,即封装好的功能模块)和 MCP(一种让 Agent 调用外部工具的标准协议,相当于“插上就能用”的通用接口)。最上层是 DataWorks 的 Data Agent:借助“语义图谱”(把表、字段、业务含义之间的关系画成图,等于给 Agent 一张企业数据词典)让它理解“销售总额”在财务和业务部门不是同一个东西,并通过 OSI 接口允许第三方 Agent 调用。

行业怎么看

支持方认为方向没毛病 —— 行业经验里,企业建 Agent 失败的多数原因不是模型差,而是数据找不到、对不齐、口径混乱。基础设施不重做,Agent 再聪明也只能在 demo 里表演。DataWorks 语义层配合 MCP 的开放策略,确实比各部门各接一个模型的拼凑方案更接近生产状态。

但我们需要保留两个质疑。第一,复杂度问题:整套架构涉及 DLF、Paimon、Fluss、MaxCompute、Hologres、PAI 等十余个阿里云产品,落地门槛远高于传统数仓(数据库)。第二,生态问题:“Agent 就绪”目前仍是阿里云自定的标准,跨云、跨厂商可移植性没人验证;海外 Databricks、Snowflake 也在做类似架构,胜负不在技术而在生态绑定。

对普通人的影响

对企业 IT:未来 1-2 年选数据平台时,会被迫做一个比过去升级重得多的决策 —— 继续加固传统数仓,还是为 Agent 重做一套底层。预算和能力都得重估。

对个人职场:“会写 SQL(结构化查询语言,数据库操作基础技能)”这道硬技能门槛正在被 DataWorks 这类自然语言生成代码的工具侵蚀;数据分析师需要向“懂业务 + 懂 Agent 调度”组合升级,否则价值空间会被压缩。

对消费市场:短期内看不到变化。Agentic Lake 的红利要传到消费端,至少还需 2-3 年,取决于有多少企业真的把 Agent 跑进生产流程。

Source: juejin.cn