Back to home

Compare

Comparing: DeepSeek's 159 Lego-Block Plugins Challenge the Fixed-Core Agent Framework & DeepSeek 把 Agent 框架拆成 159 块乐高 — 挑战欧美'固定核心'路线

AEN
DeepSeekHarnessCordis·

DeepSeek's 159 Lego-Block Plugins Challenge the Fixed-Core Agent Framework

DeepSeek's open-sourced Agent framework Harness this week ships with 159 default plugins — a radical design where even the 'scheduler brain' itself is a plugin. It's a direct challenge to the 'fixed-core' approach of frameworks like LangChain and AutoGen. This week we noticed that, unlike Western vendors still racing on parameters, DeepSeek is betting on plug-and-play assemblability.

What this is

Agent frameworks (development platforms that let AI autonomously call tools and complete tasks) currently follow a mainstream pattern: a fixed core, with tools and model adapters bolted on. DeepSeek's Harness (DSH) chose a different path — model adapters are plugins, tool registries are plugins, session logs are plugins, and even the 'agent loop' that drives each turn of conversation is a plugin. There are no privileged components.

Underpinning this design is the Cordis engine, developed by the author of the Koishi framework and battle-tested by 4,000+ community plugins. DSH runs its 159-plugin 'mega-pack' on top of Cordis, letting developers swap any module without modifying source code.

Industry view

Supporters see this as a new trend: Chinese large-model companies are shifting from 'racing on parameter scale' to 'racing on ecosystem.' When you can freely assemble at the framework layer, even mainstream Western approaches start to look clunky — open source plus plug-in architecture becomes a viable path for overtaking on a curve.

Critics raise two concerns. First, 159 default plugins are an 'onboarding disaster' for newcomers — the abstraction layers sit too high, and the learning curve is steep. Second, the maintenance cadence of Cordis upstream directly determines the stability of DSH's entire architecture. Putting your lifeline on an engine you don't own may not be a safe bet.

Impact on regular people

  • For enterprise IT: There's now an extra dimension to weigh when choosing an Agent framework — 'plugin-friendliness.' Future customization of in-house AI assistants may not require building from scratch; it'll mean assembling ready-made modules.
  • For individual professionals: This doesn't directly affect your day job, but the AI customer service and intelligent assistants you use are likely built on this kind of architecture underneath — which means more room for tuning and extension.
  • For the consumer market: A mature open-source ecosystem means lower costs for customizing AI services. Small and mid-sized companies can now access more flexible AI assistants, instead of being forced to buy the big vendors' all-in-one suites.
Source: juejin.cn
BZH
DeepSeekHarnessCordis·

DeepSeek 把 Agent 框架拆成 159 块乐高 — 挑战欧美'固定核心'路线

DeepSeek 这周开源的 Agent 框架 Harness,默认装载 159 个插件 — 一个连'调度大脑'本身都是插件的激进设计,正在挑战 LangChain、AutoGen 这些'固定核心'框架的路线。本周我们注意到,与海外厂商继续拼参数不同,DeepSeek 押注的是'可拼装'。

这是什么

Agent 框架(让 AI 自主调用工具、完成任务的开发平台)目前主流做法是:固定一个内核,外挂工具和模型适配器。DeepSeek Harness(DSH)选了另一条路 — 模型适配器是插件、工具注册表是插件、会话日志是插件,连驱动每一轮对话的'agent loop'本身也是插件,没有任何特权组件。

支撑这套设计的是 Cordis 引擎,由 Koishi 框架作者开发,已经被 4000+ 社区插件验证过。DSH 在它之上跑出 159 个插件的'全家桶',开发者可以在不修改源码的前提下替换任意模块。

行业怎么看

支持方认为这代表一种新趋势:中国大模型公司正在从'卷参数规模'转向'卷生态'。当你能在框架层自由拼装,连欧美主流路线都开始显得笨重,开源 + 插件化成了弯道超车的可能路径。

反对意见集中在两点:一是 159 个默认插件对新人来说是'上手灾难',抽象层级过高,学习曲线陡;二是 Cordis 上游的维护节奏直接决定 DSH 整套架构的稳定性 — 把命脉放在一个非自家引擎上,未必是稳的赌注。

对普通人的影响

  • 对企业 IT:选 Agent 框架时多了一个可参考的判断维度 — '插件友好度'。未来定制企业内部 AI 助手,可能不需要从零开发,而是拼装现成模块。
  • 对个人职场:不直接影响你的工作,但你用的 AI 客服、智能助手等工具,底层很可能就是这类架构,调优和扩展空间因此变大。
  • 对消费市场:开源生态成熟意味着定制 AI 服务的成本下降,中小公司也能用上更灵活的 AI 助手,而非只能买大厂'全家桶'。
Source: juejin.cn