Back to home

Compare

Comparing: LiquidAI Ships Two Small Models — Skipping the Parameter Race, Betting on Decision AI & LiquidAI 连发两款小模型 — 不卷参数规模,押注决策专用路线

AEN
LiquidAId1-3bLFM·

LiquidAI Ships Two Small Models — Skipping the Parameter Race, Betting on Decision AI

AI startup LiquidAI, spun out of MIT, dropped two small models in one week — d1-3b (3 billion parameters) and d1-omni 600m (600 million parameters). Neither is a conventional large language model; both are pitched as "decision models." Our read of the community verdict: "something new, but not enough." What people were actually waiting for was a new generation of LFM (Liquid Foundation Model), and that didn't arrive.

What this is

LiquidAI was founded by former MIT researcher Ramin Hasani, and its core tech comes from his work on "liquid neural networks" — an architecture closer to biological neurons. The d1 series is the output of that line of thinking applied to decision tasks: small parameter counts, focused on control, automation, and Agent invocation (scenarios that need fast judgment), rather than writing or chatting. The company also released GGUF-format files on HuggingFace (a compressed format suited for local deployment), which means these models can run directly on ordinary computers and even edge devices (local terminals rather than the cloud).

Industry view

Supporters argue this is the right direction: Meta's Llama, Mistral, and other general-purpose large models are already plentiful — what the market truly lacks is small, specialized models that can run locally with low latency. The Agent era needs exactly this kind of "fast and accurate" tool. The criticism is more blunt — the Reddit discussion thread drew few comments, with users writing things like "No new LFM🙁," arguing the company failed to ship a flagship and is moving slower than rivals like Mistral and Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen. Other analysts caution that inflated parameter claims and underwhelming real-world performance are recurring issues in the open-source community — a 3B-labeled model frequently loses to same-size competitors on benchmarks, so the proof will be in independent testing.

Impact on regular people

For enterprise IT: If d1 holds up in real-world testing, enterprises could deploy a local "decision small model" for risk control and process approval, no longer needing to call on hundred-billion-parameter general models for these tasks. Cloud costs could fall.

For working professionals: Limited relevance for now — decision models are primarily aimed at developer integration, and ordinary office scenarios aren't there yet. But developer community activity will be the leading indicator of whether this gains traction.

For consumer markets: No direct impact yet, but if "small models running locally" proves out, future phones, smart-home devices, and car infotainment systems could ship with stronger AI built in, without depending on the cloud.

BZH
LiquidAId1-3bLFM·

LiquidAI 连发两款小模型 — 不卷参数规模,押注决策专用路线

来自 MIT 的 AI 公司 LiquidAI 这周一口气放出两款小模型——d1-3b(30 亿参数)和 d1-omni 600m(6 亿参数),都不是常规的「大语言模型」,而是被定位成「决策模型」。社区反应是「有新东西但不够」,因为大家等的是新一代 LFM(Liquid Foundation Model),这次没来。

这是什么

LiquidAI 由前 MIT 研究员 Ramin Hasani 创立,核心技术来自他们研究的「液态神经网络」——一种更接近生物神经元的架构。d1 系列是这种思路在「决策任务」上的产物:参数量小,专注在控制、自动化、Agent(能自主执行任务的 AI)调用这类需要快速判断的场景,而不是写文章、聊天。公司同步放出了 HuggingFace 上的 GGUF 格式文件(一种便于本地部署的压缩版本),意味着可以直接在普通电脑甚至边缘设备(本地终端而非云端)上跑起来。

行业怎么看

支持者认为这是正确方向:Meta 的 Llama、Mistral 这些通用大模型已经够多,真正缺的是能在本地、低延迟跑起来的小型专用模型,Agent 时代需要的就是这种「快而准」的工具。批评意见更直接——Reddit 原帖讨论寥寥,评论区有人直接说「No new LFM🙁」,认为公司没拿出旗舰产品,节奏慢于 Mistral、阿里通义千问这些对手。也有分析提醒:小模型参数虚标、性能不及宣传的情况在开源圈屡见不鲜,3B 标称模型在跑分上经常打不过同尺寸竞品,最终得看实测。

对普通人的影响

对企业 IT:如果 d1 系列实测过关,企业可能在本地部署一个「决策小模型」做风控、流程审批,不再需要为这类任务调用动辄几百亿参数的通用模型,云成本有机会下降。 对个人职场:目前意义有限——决策模型主要面向开发者集成,普通办公场景还用不到,但开发者社区的活跃度会是判断它能不能走远的先行指标。 对消费市场:暂无直接影响,但「小模型跑在本地」的方向若成立,未来手机、智能家居、车机都可能内置更强的 AI 能力,而不依赖云端。