返回首页

对比阅读

对比阅读:DeepSeek Open-Sources Harness: Chinese AI Labs Now Race on Toolchains 与 DeepSeek 发布 Harness 开源框架 — 中国大模型公司开始卷工具链

AEN
DeepSeekHarnessAgent·

DeepSeek Open-Sources Harness: Chinese AI Labs Now Race on Toolchains

What this is

DeepSeek has open-sourced Harness (dsh), an Agent orchestration framework built around the core design principle of "everything is a plugin." Our read on what this means: competition among China's large model companies has moved from the model layer down to the toolchain layer.

Specifically, user-submitted requests are received by a "scheduling hub," broken down, distributed to different plugins for execution, and finally aggregated and returned. The architecture references the paper "A Programming Paradigm for Spatiotemporal Composability" and runs on Cordis at the base layer. The framework offers three entry points: a Web interface (pnpm dsh web), a command line, and a Python SDK (for automation scripts).

Official docs explicitly state that developing plugins should "leverage AI programming tools to complete," effectively letting AI write the toolchain for AI. One easy-to-miss detail: DeepSeek's API now uses peak/off-peak pricing, hinting that long-running Agent tasks are most cost-effective when run during nighttime off-peak hours.

Industry view

We note that this is the first time a Chinese large model company has seriously built tooling at the "Agent operating system" tier. Prior competition centered on the model itself—who scores higher on benchmarks, who prices lower. The pivot to toolchains follows the same logic as Anthropic's MCP (a standard protocol letting models call external tools) and OpenAI's Agents SDK: the model is the engine, but the toolchain is the transmission.

However, plenty of voices urge caution. First, "everything is a plugin" sounds elegant, but the cost is that every plugin must be written by the user—developer-friendly, but enterprise-IT-unfriendly. Second, the Agent orchestration track is already crowded; LangChain, AutoGen, and CrewAI are more mature, and DeepSeek won't find it easy to capture developer mindshare. Third, peak/off-peak pricing is clever, but enterprise long-running tasks often need to respond to real-time business, so the cost savings are limited.

Impact on regular people

For enterprise IT: no rush in the short term. This framework is currently more "a toy for developers" than "a product for enterprises." Worth watching, not worth allocating resources immediately.

For individual professionals: if you can code, this is a low-cost entry point for experimenting with Agent development. The Python SDK, combined with DeepSeek's relatively cheap API, lets you build a small assistant without burning cash.

For the consumer market: no visible impact yet. The winner of the Agent toolchain race hasn't emerged—wait for a few benchmark cases before judging.

来源: juejin.cn
BZH
DeepSeekHarnessAgent·

DeepSeek 发布 Harness 开源框架 — 中国大模型公司开始卷工具链

这是什么

DeepSeek 开源了 Agent 编排框架 Harness(dsh),把「一切皆插件」做成核心设计。这件事的意义,我们判断是:中国大模型公司的竞争从模型层打到工具链层。

具体来说,用户提交的需求被一个「调度中心」接收,拆解后分发给不同插件执行,最后汇总返回。架构参考论文《A Programming Paradigm for Spatiotemporal Composability》,底层由 Cordis 驱动。框架提供三种入口:Web 界面(pnpm dsh web)、命令行、Python SDK(用于自动化脚本)。

官方文档明确说,开发插件要「借助 AI 编程工具来完成」,等于让 AI 写 AI 的工具链。一个不起眼的细节:DeepSeek API 已采用峰谷定价,暗示 Agent 长时任务应在夜间低谷跑才划算。

行业怎么看

我们注意到,这是中国大模型公司第一次认真做「Agent 操作系统」级别的工具。之前的竞争集中在模型本身——谁跑分高、谁价格低。现在切到工具链,逻辑和 Anthropic 做 MCP(一种让模型调用外部工具的标准协议)、OpenAI 做 Agents SDK 一致:模型是发动机,工具链才是变速箱。

但值得警惕的声音不少。第一,「一切皆插件」听着优雅,代价是所有插件都要自己写——对开发者友好,对企业 IT 不友好。第二,Agent 编排赛道已经很挤,LangChain、AutoGen、CrewAI 都更成熟,DeepSeek 想抢开发者心智并不容易。第三,峰谷定价虽聪明,但企业长时任务往往要响应实时业务,省钱效应有限。

对普通人的影响

对企业 IT:短期内不用急。这套框架目前更像「给开发者的玩具」,不是「给企业的产品」。可以观察,不必立刻投入资源。

对个人职场:如果你会写代码,这是个低成本试水 Agent 开发的入口。Python SDK 加上 DeepSeek 相对便宜的 API,能让你在不烧钱的情况下搭一个小助手。

对消费市场:暂时看不出影响。Agent 工具链的赢家还没出现,等跑出几个标杆案例再判断也不迟。

来源: juejin.cn